Miguel Duran holds credentials from the US Institute of Diplomacy and Human Rights: Diplomatic Protocol and Etiquette (Credential ID 53924083), Human Rights (Credential ID 54049576), Human Trafficking Prevention (Credential ID 54250917), and Protecting the Rights of the Child in Humanitarian Situations (Credential ID 165487075).

MISSION STATEMENT

Our mission is to protect, empower, and advocate for Black, African, Hispanic, and Latino communities by promoting fairness, accountability, and equal treatment across public institutions. We work to expose systemic injustices, strengthen community resilience, and ensure that vulnerable populations have access to representation, transparency, and justice at local, national, and international levels. Through documentation, advocacy, education, and community engagement, we strive to defend human rights and uphold the dignity of every individual.

VISION & VALUES
VISION

We envision a society where Black, African, Hispanic, and Latino communities are treated with dignity, fairness, and respect — free from discrimination, institutional abuse, and administrative misconduct. Our long‑term vision is to build an internationally recognized advocacy organization capable of elevating community concerns to global platforms, including the United Nations, and ensuring that historically marginalized groups have a powerful voice in shaping policies that affect their lives.

CORE VALUES

Community Empowerment
We support education, awareness, and leadership development to strengthen community resilience and self‑advocacy.

Justice
We believe every individual deserves equal protection under the law and fair treatment by public institutions.

Accountability
We advocate for transparent government processes, ethical conduct, and oversight mechanisms that prevent abuse of power.

Human Dignity
We affirm the inherent worth of Black, African, Hispanic, and Latino communities and defend their right to safety, opportunity, and respect.

Representation
We work to ensure that communities of color — especially those without strong institutional advocates — have a voice in national and international decision‑making spaces.

Truth & Documentation
We value evidence‑based advocacy and maintain a commitment to documenting irregularities, misconduct, and systemic patterns affecting vulnerable populations.

Since 2007, Miguel Duran began his journey by filing two Section 1983 complaints related to white supremacy incidents with local law enforcement in Atlantic City. Content Details

07-5994 – DURAN v. WARNER et al Signed by Judge Renee Marie Bumb

(drw)), https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/USCOURTS-njd-1_07-cv-05994/USCOURTS-njd-1_07-cv-05994-4.Closex

He claims he was wrongfully imprisoned on false charges and became a strong advocate for detainees and correctional officers. Concerned about poor conditions and airborne diseases affecting employees and their families, he aimed to support and care for them, creating a support network among the correctional officers and their loved ones. DURAN v. MERLINE et al, No. 1:2007cv03589 –

Miguel Duran states that local city police and county officials have demonstrated an interconnected network tied to organized. Miguel Duran has continued to uncover information that, in his view, exposes troubling connections between crime, cartels, and certain elements within local government. He believes that many people are unaware of the depth and complexity of these issues. 14-4120 – DURAN et al v. THE WELFARE REFORM ACT CONGRESS UNKNOWN WHO PASS THE LAW et al

According to Miguel, the intricate web of power operating within the United States has the capacity to dismantle any family or individual, and he states that he has studied how agencies such as Homeland Security and advanced surveillance technologies have been used to target him, his family, and his friends.

Miguel allegation that Property were he reside with Michele L Baxter was taken by force ¶50. On January 20, 2010, a Certificate of Default Judgment was filed by Edward Vincent, Esq. (counsel for the Bank of New York Mellon, via Frenkel Lambert), constituting a defective and fraudulent instrument encouraged by government liquidation programs and the Reserve Foreign Exchange Swap Agreements Program. The name of the filer was scratched off with a pen to conceal identity, and a judge’s name was stamped. The certification disclosed only “Edw.”

¶51. On January 28, 2011, an $8.5 million settlement was reached. The plaintiff and Michele L. Baxter were whistleblowers who gave information to company leaders and local officials. The Court would not reopen the case or respond to the complaint, hiding the wrongdoing.

¶52. On August 30, 2012, a second Default Judgment complaint was filed by Frenkel Lambert, specifically by attorney Naser Selmanovick, who was overseeing the swaps agreement.

¶53. The plaintiff, who had two children with Michele L. Baxter and lived at the property, faced legal issues for having the deeds and property. The banks tried to claim ownership without legal rights, unable to show possession of the original note or deeds, and did not offer any rights or compensation.

¶54. On February 7, 2013, the plaintiff filed a complaint under Michele L. Baxter’s name, pointing out legal malpractice, the Courts and Corporations acting outside their authority, violations of due process, uncontested services, and the fraudulent default judgment. The complaint was delivered to the Courts, corporations, local officials, county officials, the Foreclosure Unit, and lawyers for all bankers and corporations.

¶55. In February 2013, the plaintiff and Michele L. Baxter filed a counterclaim in Burlington County Superior Court, challenging a fake mortgage debt and claiming violations of federal civil rights laws, including 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(2) and (3), 18 U.S.C. §§ 241, 242, 1341 (Mail Fraud), and 1343 (Wire Fraud), and the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution.

¶56. On March 1, 2013, Frenkel Lambert, through attorney Naser Selmanovick, dismissed the foreclosure in a valid certificate. On March 7, 2013, Edward A. Vincent, Esq., confirmed the dismissal and asked the Courts not to reopen the case and to cancel all foreclosure hearings.

¶57. The Bank of New York Mellon was involved in trading properties with Countrywide Financial Corporation, and the New Jersey Commissioner of Stock Exchange Board Members did not regulate or report the management. The Commissioners did not intervene, conspired, and failed the transaction in violation of Section 78c-1 (Swap Agreements) and 7 U.S.C. § 6 (Regulation of Futures Trading and Foreign Transactions).

¶58. Reopening the case would have revealed: (a) fake Certificates of Default Judgment; (b) fake death certificates that would show insurance fraud by lenders, bankers, and underwriters; (c) conspirators including Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Black Rock Financial Management Inc., Pacific Investment Management Company LLC, and Federal Home Loan Mortgage (Freddie Mac) Corporation; (d) the January 28, 2011 settlement as an illegal trade; and (e) whether the New Jersey Commissioner of Stock Exchange Board Members committed fraud in giving whistleblower rewards and protections.

¶59. The plaintiff claims that he and Michele L. Baxter were the original informants under 31 U.S.C. § 3729. The whistleblower compensation should go to the first plaintiff who filed the complaint. (15 U.S.C. § 78u-6(h)(1)(A); Dodd-Frank Act; Qui Tam and False Claims Act)

Mr. Durán asserts that in several regions — including New Jersey (NJ), Georgia, Pennsylvania, and New York (NY) — certain local police departments operate in ways that, in his view, resemble criminal organizations, differing only in their uniforms and badges. He emphasizes that his concerns are not personal grievances but the result of years of documentation, analysis, and direct experience.

According to Mr. Durán, he has identified recurring patterns of coordination between specific municipal officials and certain businesses across multiple cities. He states that these patterns raise serious questions about the integrity, transparency, and accountability of local governance and contribute to a broader culture of corruption that disproportionately harms vulnerable communities.

Mr. Durán further alleges that local city police officers have assaulted him on multiple occasions and have repeatedly fabricated criminal charges against him. He states that these actions were intended to intimidate him, damage his credibility, and obstruct his efforts to document misconduct. As Miguel continues his investigation, he reports uncovering additional evidence suggesting a systemic issue that extends beyond isolated incidents. He argues that these findings highlight the urgent need for comprehensive reform to protect communities from exploitation and to ensure that individuals in positions of authority uphold the law with integrity and respect for human rights.

Miguel stresses that these revelations demonstrate the necessity of public scrutiny and civic engagement. He urges citizens to demand accountability from their leaders and to challenge systems that allow abuses of power to go unchecked.

For nearly two decades, Miguel has diligently gathered a substantial collection of documents, records, and communications that he believes expose administrative irregularities and instances of harassment carried out by municipal, County and state officials.

Mr. Durán reports that he has lived in multiple cities across the United States and has observed what he believes to be openly practiced corruption operating in a manner consistent with organized criminal activity. He states that, in several jurisdictions, officials or intermediaries allegedly requested or insinuated payments of approximately $30,000 or 20% of income or business transactions in order to avoid sanctions, adverse inspections, administrative delays, or unjustified business closures.

Mr. Durán asserts that these allegations require formal verification through public records, independent audits, or official investigations. He reports that the New Jersey Attorney General and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) have not taken action regarding the individuals he believes are responsible for these alleged crimes, raising concerns about oversight and accountability.

Mr. Durán further alleges that he possesses evidence which, in his view, proves beyond a reasonable doubt that local city police officers were responsible for the murder of the mothers of his children. He states that his property has been repeatedly destroyed, including incidents of residential arson, destruction of personal belongings, and the impoundment of more than fifty vehicles. He believes these actions were intended to intimidate him, cause financial harm, and create staged scenarios designed to appear accidental.

.

Mr. Durán reports that the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCP&P) pressured the children’s mother, Michele L. Baxter, to comply with state‑mandated services in a manner he believes was intended to shield the state from liability. He further alleges that both mothers of his children were killed because they had direct knowledge of events he had documented and were potential witnesses.

These statements form part of Mr. Durán’s broader claim that certain municipal officials and private individuals have engaged in coordinated wrongdoing. He states that he has collected extensive documents and communications that, in his view, demonstrate organized criminal activity involving officials in New Jersey (NJ), Georgia, Pennsylvania (PA), and New York (NY).

According to Mr. Durán, the conduct he has observed across these states meets the characteristics of organized crime. He reports that he has lived in multiple cities throughout the United States and has repeatedly encountered what he believes to be openly practiced corruption. In several jurisdictions, he alleges that officials or intermediaries requested or implied that payments of approximately $30,000 or 20% of income or business transactions were necessary to avoid sanctions, retaliatory inspections, administrative delays, or unjustified business closures.

Mr. Durán states that these allegations require verification through public records, independent audits, and formal investigations. He reports that neither the New Jersey Attorney General nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has taken action on his complaints, which he believes raises serious concerns about oversight and accountability.

He further alleges that he possesses evidence which, in his view, establishes that local city police officers were responsible for the deaths of the mothers of his children. He also reports repeated destruction of his property, including residential arson, damage to personal belongings, and the impoundment of more than fifty vehicles. Mr. Durán believes these actions were intended to intimidate him, inflict financial harm, and create incidents that appeared accidental or unrelated.

Miguel allegation that Local city Police has fabricated charges over 10 times

Alleged Targeting and Business Interference

Mr. Durán alleges that local city police officers and certain municipal officials intentionally targeted his business by:

• Damaging property
• Destroying equipment
• Intimidating or scaring away customers

He states that these actions caused significant financial loss and were part of a broader pattern of retaliation.

He further alleges that there have been multiple attempts on his life, which he believes were staged to appear accidental.

Alleged Homicides of Witnesses

Mr. Durán reports that the mothers of his two children were murdered in 2019 and 2022, and that Michele L. Baxter, a key witness, was murdered in 2018. He alleges that:

• Local city police officers were responsible
• Municipal officials encouraged or motivated others to harm him and his family
• These incidents occurred after he filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint involving Atlantic City police officers he believes were associated with a white supremacy group

He states that these deaths were connected to their roles as witnesses.

Allegations Involving DCP&P

Mr. Durán alleges that the New Jersey Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCP&P):

• Forcibly removed his two daughters
• Threatened to take Ms. Baxter’s unborn child unless she dismissed a lawsuit against Atlantic City Electric
• Acted in coordination with individuals he believes were connected to a white supremacy group

He states that these actions were intended to protect the state from liability.

6. Patterns of Misconduct Identified

He states that this activity implicates both local and state police due to enforcement practices.

Based on documentation collected since 2007, Mr. Durán reports recurring patterns involving municipal officials and certain businesses, These allegations form part of Mr. Durán’s broader claim that municipal officials and associated private actors have engaged in coordinated misconduct, including:

Improper use of inspections or permits

Economic pressure

Informal extortion

Administrative interference

Alleged Organized Criminal Activity

According to Mr. Durán, one component of the organized criminal activity he has documented involves:

Documentation Collected

Mr. Durán states that he has gathered extensive:

• Documents
• Records
• Communications
• Photographs and evidence of property damage

He believes these materials demonstrate administrative irregularities, harassment, and coordinated misconduct across multiple jurisdictions.

Illegal Dealer Plates and Temporary Tags

• Sold through Facebook and other online platforms
• Often counterfeit
• Used as part of broader criminal tactics

He alleges that:

• Purchasers are exposed to criminal charges
• Vehicles and tools are frequently seized
• Millions of dollars in unreported income have been generated
• Cities impose impound fees up to three times higher than appropriate

Mr. Durán states that he has collected extensive documents, records, and communications supporting his belief that the conduct he has observed constitutes organized criminal activity involving municipal and state officials in New Jersey (NJ), Georgia, Pennsylvania (PA), and New York (NY). He alleges that certain local police departments have gone beyond misconduct and have actively collaborated with criminal elements.

According to Mr. Durán, local city police officers have hired or utilized gang members, cartel‑affiliated individuals, and other criminal actors to target him, intimidate him, and create an atmosphere of fear. He reports that these actions were intended to pressure him, obstruct his efforts to document wrongdoing, and deter him from pursuing complaints or legal remedies.

Mr. Durán asserts that these activities form part of a broader pattern of coordinated behavior that, in his view, meets the characteristics of organized crime. He states that he has repeatedly experienced:

• Targeted harassment
• Property destruction
• Intimidation by individuals he believes were acting at the direction of law enforcement or municipal officials

He further alleges that these actions were designed to appear spontaneous or unrelated, while serving the purpose of silencing him and undermining his credibility.

Specific Case: Elizabeth, New Jersey

In the particular case of Elizabeth, New Jersey, Miguel states that he has documented incidents that, according to his interpretation, show possible irregularities in the actions of:

• Municipal inspectors
• Fire Department personnel
• Police Department members

These allegations include:

• Repeated inspections without clear justification
• Inconsistent or contradictory fines
• Interference with legitimate business activities
• Coordination between departments for simultaneous actions
• Economic or administrative pressure on local businesses

Miguel posits that these patterns may be linked to broader networks of local corruption or external influence. His allegations are bolstered by video footage, photographs, and witness testimonies. Miguel asserts that immigrants in the USA have been unjustly targeted, particularly in cities where local authorities have seized their properties. He recounts an instance where local police pressured him to cooperate in these property seizures. https://www.tiktok.com/@mtasllc/video/7285585127160171819?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc Miguel refused, which he describes as the beginning of a nightmare, https://www.tiktok.com/@mtasllc/video/7285581815744564522?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc https://www.tiktok.com/@mtasllc/video/7285581739953556782?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc during which he claims he was threatened with the closure of his business—https://www.tiktok.com/@mtasllc/video/7301130341471817003?is_from_webapp=1&sender_device=pc an action allegedly facilitated by the City of Elizabeth in conjunction with the City of Hillside. Furthermore, Miguel indicates that members of the African American community, as well as Hispanic or Latino citizens, have been drawn into this situation, suggesting the emergence of an organized effort. While he recognizes that formally verifying such connections necessitates official investigation, access to public records, and independent review by competent authorities, he remains firm in his belief that these issues warrant serious attention.